HBR – How Star Women Build Portable Skills

HBR – How Star Women Build Portable Skills

2017-08-18T13:19:57+00:00April 7th, 2008|Harvard Business Review|

In the ‘What is your dream?‘ questionnaire, one of the questions posed is — What is the biggest challenge (personal or professional) I've overcome?  Who would I be had I not surmounted this?

Because one of my most daunting professional challenges was working on Wall Street, I was intrigued when my friend Stacey Petrey referred me to Professor Boris Groysberg's article ‘How Star Women Build Portable Skills‘, a study which states that women are generally more successful than men in moving from one job to another because of the portability of our skills.

Hbr_groysberg_star_women

Groysberg states “women have learned how to build external networks of clients, associates, and other professionals outside the organizations – that remain intact when they depart…Not because women set out to do this, but because they

[women] are often marginalized and have to fight institutional barriers, so they build external networks out of necessity.”

I found Professor Groysberg's case study so affirming that I sent him an e-mail telling him — yes, I really am trying to walk my talk of getting in the game).  This contact serendipitously led to an interview by Rob Weisman at the Boston Globe for his article on Groysberg's findings.

Globe_shifting_stars

Can you relate to this as much as I can?

You're trying to figure out how to get something important done, whether personally or professionally, and it's just not happening.

So you get creative — you buck convention — and you get it done (whether at work, in the community, your children's school), and in the process you find you've developed one of your greatest strengths.

What is that strength?

After you read Groysberg's case study, and Weisman's article, what would you add?

What thing have you tried to get done for which traditional channels were blocked, so you created a workaround solution?  What ‘portable skills' did you acquire in the process?

Would you agree that there are parallels to Psyche's 2nd Task of gathering the fleece?

Have any of you read Clayton Christensen's The Innovator's Solution?  Isn't it true that as we are trying to get something done, we are in effect the innovator vs. the incumbent?

Related posts:
Second Thoughts on Psyche's 2nd Task

Rachel vs. Leah: Reclaiming Our Power to Dream

Book Club: There's a Business in Every Woman

What if Madeleine L'Engle Hadn't Dared to Dream?

Valuing What Women Do